歐聯又殺到啦

Eddie 寫到:

雖然我係曼聯躉, 但都估唔到擒晚場波踢咗11分鐘就玩完.

睇左15分左半個鐘,醒左輸到三蛋,立刻覺,冇引,我係兵工廠fans,幾十年,

車仔咁樣出局，真無陰公，主要係有ballack呢個無運球員，所以捧唔到杯。美斯話要俾車仔見識真正足球，結果巴塞全場只得思尼斯達個球為正式射門，可見車仔幾利害，能因應唔同對手，踼出唔同戰術，搞到巴塞無晒符，咁先到係真正足球。其實做人都一樣呀 ，咪以為攻得就好勁呀

Colin 寫到:

車仔咁樣出局，真無陰公，主要係有ballack呢個無運球員，所以捧唔到杯。美斯話要俾車仔見識真正足球，結果巴塞全場只得思尼斯達個球為正式射門，可見車仔幾利害，能因應唔同對手，踼出唔同戰術，搞到巴塞無晒符，咁先到係真正足球。其實做人都一樣呀 ，咪以為攻得就好勁呀

Colin哥我就唔同意，真正足球?唔係要入波咩?君不見世界球壇始終巴西足球最受歡迎，就算意大利西德擺幾多次世界盃，受歡迎程度始終不及巴西。進攻足球始終是皇道，你幾精於計算耗盡心思防守都會百密一疏，與其消極不如不斷進攻入完一球再一球

再講Drogba lee條友，成個大隻佬但一入禁區一碰到就跌，跌完不特止重成日扮傷拖時間，最後更大鬧球証。佢自己不如怨自己對住龍門都射唔入重好

Adam 寫到:

Colin 寫到:

車仔咁樣出局，真無陰公，主要係有ballack呢個無運球員，所以捧唔到杯。美斯話要俾車仔見識真正足球，結果巴塞全場只得思尼斯達個球為正式射門，可見車仔幾利害，能因應唔同對手，踼出唔同戰術，搞到巴塞無晒符，咁先到係真正足球。其實做人都一樣呀 ，咪以為攻得就好勁呀

Colin哥我就唔同意，真正足球?唔係要入波咩?君不見世界球壇始終巴西足球最受歡迎，就算意大利西德擺幾多次世界盃，受歡迎程度始終不及巴西。進攻足球始終是皇道，你幾精於計算耗盡心思防守都會百密一疏，與其消極不如不斷進攻入完一球再一球

再講Drogba lee條友，成個大隻佬但一入禁區一碰到就跌，跌完不特止重成日扮傷拖時間，最後更大鬧球証。佢自己不如怨自己對住龍門都射唔入重好

我都幾憎呢條友, 佢扮嘢仲誇過C朗十倍

i watched the highlight tonite, but Barca is really lucky to have a late draw ... Chelsea had more goal chances but can grab them well ... For Drogba, I think he is a quality footballer and diver. Indeed, he is difficult to play against (big, strong, good aerial power, with decent shooting, foot work and speed) ...

However, I think United will win Barca as they are always a very lucky but awful team ... sorry for my prejudice

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Colin 寫到:

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

係呀, 的確係中國人嘅幸福, 你估我地有冇可能一齊出嚟睇波一齊嗌下咁呢?

Colin 寫到:

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Agree!! 雖然我係利記Fans所以唔support曼聯，但係ManU先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Sorry Adam, I cannot agree with you, football at the end its about winning trophies, n history taught us that its defense that secured the trophies, not attack. A good team always build on good defense. 巴西 won 2002 world cup because 佢地改善咗後防，唔係improve咗進攻。

不過，小弟作為球迷當然support進攻足球啦

Peter 寫到:

Colin 寫到:

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Agree!! 雖然我係利記Fans所以唔support曼聯，但係ManU先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Sorry Adam, I cannot agree with you, football at the end its about winning trophies, n history taught us that its defense that secured the trophies, not attack. A good team always build on good defense. 巴西 won 2002 world cup because 佢地改善咗後防，唔係improve咗進攻。

不過，小弟作為球迷當然support進攻足球啦

深宵捱眼瞓睇波撞正901戰術真係火都爆

雖然我係比較喜歡曼聯，但無可否認，巴塞的波真係好好睇‥‥

Peter 寫到:

Colin 寫到:

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Agree!! 雖然我係利記Fans所以唔support曼聯，但係ManU先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Sorry Adam, I cannot agree with you, football at the end its about winning trophies, n history taught us that its defense that secured the trophies, not attack. A good team always build on good defense. 巴西 won 2002 world cup because 佢地改善咗後防，唔係improve咗進攻。

不過，小弟作為球迷當然support進攻足球啦

呢的叫做要贏人，先要贏自己，獨狜一味，好容易俾人搞掂。that's why現代足球，越來越重視戰術運用，加上電腦幫助，耍分析某隊某球員踢法實在不難。但要度到克敵戰略，又要有球員執行到指令，又唔係咁容易，再加上臨場應變，所以Hiddink，摩連奴等咁值錢。但車仔如搵AC個領隊過檔，就註定會渡過失敗一年

Colin 寫到:

Peter 寫到:

Colin 寫到:

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Agree!! 雖然我係利記Fans所以唔support曼聯，但係ManU先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Sorry Adam, I cannot agree with you, football at the end its about winning trophies, n history taught us that its defense that secured the trophies, not attack. A good team always build on good defense. 巴西 won 2002 world cup because 佢地改善咗後防，唔係improve咗進攻。

不過，小弟作為球迷當然support進攻足球啦

呢的叫做要贏人，先要贏自己，獨狜一味，好容易俾人搞掂。that's why現代足球，越來越重視戰術運用，加上電腦幫助，耍分析某隊某球員踢法實在不難。但要度到克敵戰略，又要有球員執行到指令，又唔係咁容易，再加上臨場應變，所以Hiddink，摩連奴等咁值錢。但車仔如搵AC個領隊過檔，就註定會渡過失敗一年

所以我更加撑曼聯囉, 上場巴塞對車仔就好明顯Hiddink KO Guardiola啦

Peter 寫到:

Eddie 寫到:

Colin 寫到:

Peter 寫到:

Colin 寫到:

真係遲鈍呀，岩岩先至發覺下星期四唔使返工，可以睇波，捧曼聯場。我認為曼聯先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Agree!! 雖然我係利記Fans所以唔support曼聯，但係ManU先至係最強，攻守兼備。

Sorry Adam, I cannot agree with you, football at the end its about winning trophies, n history taught us that its defense that secured the trophies, not attack. A good team always build on good defense. 巴西 won 2002 world cup because 佢地改善咗後防，唔係improve咗進攻。

不過，小弟作為球迷當然support進攻足球啦

呢的叫做要贏人，先要贏自己，獨狜一味，好容易俾人搞掂。that's why現代足球，越來越重視戰術運用，加上電腦幫助，耍分析某隊某球員踢法實在不難。但要度到克敵戰略，又要有球員執行到指令，又唔係咁容易，再加上臨場應變，所以Hiddink，摩連奴等咁值錢。但車仔如搵AC個領隊過檔，就註定會渡過失敗一年

所以我更加撑曼聯囉, 上場巴塞對車仔就好明顯Hiddink KO Guardiola啦

對！！ Hiddink 絕對 KO Guardiola，好可惜Hiddink係四仔命，硬入唔到決賽，無計，輸比嗰天

因為佢帶燕豪芬、南韓同俄羅斯都唔係最top球隊，入到四強，隊隊都咁堅，除教綀功力外，球員質素尤其重要

估唔到費sir今次甩鬚, 放生美斯, 中場冇活力, 抵輸...

A boring game again

曼聯，無話可說

Peter 寫到:

Eddie 寫到:

估唔到費sir今次甩鬚, 放生美斯, 中場冇活力, 抵輸...

好明顯論實力，巴塞是高D，但係曼聯絕對可以用戰術 + 針對性佈署擊敗對手，車仔已經有板你睇，可惜費sir戰術錯誤+排陣失當，傑斯條老柴都比佢踢足大半埸，好明顯中場唔夠活力，輸晒......... 都唔換走傑斯，重放生埋美斯..........冇話可說，好失望......(雖然我唔係ManU fans)

我諗費sir係自尊心作怪唔想學車仔咁衰仔，加上情意結唔想換走傑斯，對住巴塞踢4-3-3(如果我無錯的話)真係等死。唔知巴塞頭10分鐘比曼聯捺住攻係有心定冇意，如果係有心，Guardiola就真係高到不得了，絕對要寫個服字

100%認同, 我係傑斯fans都係咁話, 巴塞嘅速度傑斯絕對跟唔上, 亦好同意費sir用佢係情意結...唉, 感情用事都你敗家架喇....

Peter 寫到:

Eddie 寫到:

估唔到費sir今次甩鬚, 放生美斯, 中場冇活力, 抵輸...

好明顯論實力，巴塞是高D，但係曼聯絕對可以用戰術 + 針對性佈署擊敗對手，車仔已經有板你睇，可惜費sir戰術錯誤+排陣失當，傑斯條老柴都比佢踢足大半埸，好明顯中場唔夠活力，輸晒......... 都唔換走傑斯，重放生埋美斯..........冇話可說，好失望......(雖然我唔係ManU fans)

我諗費sir係自尊心作怪唔想學車仔咁衰仔，加上情意結唔想換走傑斯，對住巴塞踢4-3-3(如果我無錯的話)真係等死。唔知巴塞頭10分鐘比曼聯捺住攻係有心定冇意，如果係有心，Guardiola就真係高到不得了，絕對要寫個服字

車仔公認低巴塞半班，所以能屈能伸，打五個中場，倒塞巴塞，打亂佢地節奏。但曼聯點會覺得低過巴塞，所以只打3個中場，結果咪.........

so sad that Man U is out of the game, the goal from Robben was excellent indeed

Simon 寫到:

so sad that Man U is out of the game, the goal from Robben was excellent indeed

個角球ManU無mark Robben 係一個致命傷‥‥‥poor

caleb 寫到:

Simon 寫到:

so sad that Man U is out of the game, the goal from Robben was excellent indeed

個角球ManU無mark Robben 係一個致命傷‥‥‥poor

主客兩場都係捉到鹿脫唔到角，越領先越驚輸，最後出局，咎由自取．．．